[Moving picture of popcorn]

Laramie Movie Scope:
Lions for Lambs

Hollywood's take on Bush's wars

[Strip of film rule]
by Robert Roten, Film Critic
[Strip of film rule]

January 17, 2008 -- This movie takes turns tracking three stories at once. One is an interview by a top TV reporter, Janine Roth (played by Meryl Streep of “Rendition”) of hawkish Republican Senator Jasper Irving (Tom Cruise of “War of the Worlds”) about a new war strategy in Afghanistan. The second story is about a couple of soldiers whose job it is to carry out Irving's strategy on the ground. The third story is a discussion between a college student and his professor (who previously taught those same two soldiers). There is a free-ranging discussion about the politics of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, about the incompetence of those planning the strategies for those wars and about the apathy of the public about the wars. It doesn't take a genius to know who is going to be sacrificed in this weak morality tale.

It isn't a badly constructed story, but it is a bit low on drama. The session between Roth and Irving sounded a lot more like an argument than an interview, and a poorly reasoned and ill-informed argument at that. I saw little evidence of journalism in it. The discussion between the professor, Stephen Malley (played by Robert Redford of “An Unfinished Life,” who also directs the film) and his student, Todd Hayes (Andrew Garfield of “Mumbo Jumbo”) works a little bit better. The tale of the two soldiers, Ernest Rodriguez (Michael Peña of “Shooter”) and Lt. Arian Finch (Derek Luke of “Catch a Fire”) is the most compelling of the three stories. There is a fourth scene in which Roth discusses her exclusive story with her editor, Howard (Kevin Dunn of “Transformers”).

The whole discussion between Roth and Howard isn't about the merits of the story itself, but about the possible impact of a friggin text crawl at the bottom of the screen during a news telecast. A text crawl that's here now and gone in two hours has about the same impact as a fart in a feedlot. The argument misses the point. Roth wants to criticize Irving's military strategy (like that's going to happen in a text crawl). Instead of whining she needed to do some actual work and get the opinions of military strategists, and those are not hard to come by in Washington D.C. The real fight will be over the resulting story, not a little text crawl on the bottom of a TV screen that'll only be noticed by news junkies and conspiracy theorists. The real problem with the war in Afghanistan is the lack of troops and resources needed to fight the war. Where are those resources? In Iraq, of course, but none of the dull sharpies in this movie mention that. They are too busy arguing about Vietnam and text crawls. This film rates a C+.

Click here for links to places to buy or rent this movie in video and/or DVD format, or to buy the soundtrack, posters, books, even used videos, games, electronics and lots of other stuff. I suggest you shop at least two of these places before buying anything. Prices seem to vary continuously. For more information on this film, click on this link to The Internet Movie Database. Type in the name of the movie in the search box and press enter. You will be able to find background information on the film, the actors, and links to much more information.

[Strip of film rule]
Copyright © 2008 Robert Roten. All rights reserved.
Reproduced with the permission of the copyright holder.
[Strip of film rule]
Back to the Laramie Movie Scope index.
[Rule made of Seventh Seal sillouettes]

Robert Roten can be reached via e-mail at my last name at lariat dot org. [Mailer button: image of letter and envelope]

(If you e-mail me with a question about this or any other movie or review, please mention the name of the movie you are asking the question about, otherwise I may have no way of knowing which film you are referring to)